Velopedia Bicycle Archive

Compare Bicycles

Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.

1 of 2 bicycles

At a glance

Key differences

Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.

  1. Gearing

    2002 Diamondback Response has a 7% lower climbing ratio than 2001 Diamondback Response.

    A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.

Gearing comparison

Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.

RPM

RPM = pedal turns per minute.

2002 Diamondback ResponseSize Legacy reference · 42/32/22T · 11–30T · 8-speed
Lowest0.73:1Highest3.82:1Total range521%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.1 mphHighest gear26.5 mph

Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.

2001 Diamondback ResponseSize Legacy reference · 42/32/22T · 12–28T · 8-speed
Lowest0.79:1Highest3.50:1Total range445%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.5 mphHighest gear24.3 mph

Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.

How it works

Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.

Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.

Try other gearing

Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Print / PDFCSV
Specification
2002 Diamondback Response
2001 Diamondback Response
Overview
Model Year
2002
2001
Brand
Diamondback
Diamondback
Model
Response
Response
Bicycle Type
Mountain bike, front suspension
Mountain bike, front suspension
Original MSRP
$329.99
$359.99
Colors
Blue/Black, Red/Black
Blue, Chrome-Plated
Sizes
L, M, S, womens medium, womens small, XL, XS
XS, S, M, L, XL
Weight
—
—
Frameset
Frame Construction
TIG-welded
TIG-welded
Frame Material
7005 aluminum w/replaceable derailleur hanger
7005 aluminum w/replaceable derailleur hanger
Fork
RST Gila TL, 2.5" travel
In Sync SYS-266, 2.5" travel
Fork Material
Aluminum, single triple-clamp crown
Aluminum, triple-clamp crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
Shimano Acera
Mountain Mix
Shifters
Shimano Acera EZ Fire Plus
Shimano Acera EZ Fire Plus
Front Derailleur
Shimano Acera, top-pull/clamp-on 31.8mm
Shimano Acera, top-pull/clamp-on 31.8mm
Rear Derailleur
Shimano Acera
Shimano Acera
Crankset
Shimano Acera FC-MC19-L, 22/32/42 teeth
Sugino Impel 150, 22/32/42 teeth
Bottom Bracket
Sealed cartridge, 110mm spindle
Sealed cartridge, 102mm spindle
BB Shell Width
68mm English
68mm English
Rear Cogs
8-speed, 11 - 30 teeth
8-speed, 12 - 28 teeth
Chain
Shimano CN-IG31, 1/2 x 3/32"
KMC IG-31, 1/2 x 1/8"
Pedals
Resin MTB
Resin body/aluminum cage w/clips & straps
Brakes
Brakes
Aluminum linear-pull brakes, Shimano Acera levers
ProMax linear-pull brakes, Shimano Acera levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1 1/8" integrated Tien Hsin No.10 ZST
1 1/8" threadless Tange Seiki TG-3
Handlebar
Aluminum, 1" rise
Steel, 30mm rise
Handlebar Extensions
Not included
Not included
Stem
Aluminum Ahead type
Aluminum Ahead type
Saddle
Avenir
Avenir Performance Plus
Seatpost
Aluminum micro-adjust, 27.2mm diameter
Aluminum micro-adjust, 27.2mm diameter
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
Aluminum
Front: aluminum O/S, Rear: aluminum, Q/R
Rims
Weinmann CN-520, 36-hole
Alex Y-2000, 36-hole
Spokes
Chung Nan stainless steel, 14ga. (2.0mm) straight gauge
Stainless steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Spoke Nipples
Brass nipples
Brass nipples
Front Tire
26 x 1.95" all terrain
26 x 1.95" multi-terrain
Wheel Size
26" wheels
26" wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
71°
71°
Seat-tube angle
73°
73°
Chainstay / rear center
424.2 mm
424.2 mm
Wheelbase
1059.2 mm
1064.3 mm
Fork offset / rake
38.1 mm
—

Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.

Campaign
Scroll to Top