—
—
Velopedia Tools
Calculate the geometry. Understand the proportions. Compare real bikes.
Use published or measured bicycle dimensions to understand frame proportions, wheelbase and steering geometry. When fork offset is available, the analyzer also calculates trail, then compares the bike with distinct, known-size modern geometries in the Bicycle Archive.
Use this Analyzer when you already have one bicycle or geometry chart in mind. Still choosing what to consider? Bike Finder is the easier starting point.
See it before you start
The interactive example below shows the actual Analyzer display immediately. It demonstrates the measurement map only; none of its values are loaded into your form or treated as your bike.
Interactive example
Loading the interactive geometry example…
Horizontal bottom-bracket-to-head-tube coordinate.
Illustrative road/gravel geometry used only to demonstrate the display. Your analysis is generated separately from one real bike and frame size, then adds category-relative interpretation and closest Archive comparisons.
Analyze a real bike
Search the Archive, or continue directly into the blank manual worksheet below.
Search by year, brand or model, then choose one published size to carry its available measurements into the Analyzer.
The manual worksheet is already open below. You will need wheel and tire size, head angle, reach and stack from one frame size; optional measurements can stay blank.
No particular bike in mind? Let Bike Finder narrow the choices
Velopedia Archive analysis
Category-aware interpretation and comparison with preserved bicycle geometries.
Back to bike recordCalculating the static geometry and checking the closest relevant Archive cohort.
Published source values
These measurements come from the historical record. They describe one unidentified source size, so Velopedia does not infer reach, stack, fit, or a frame drawing.
The period benchmark and closest records below use only head angle, wheelbase, and rear center—the three measurements preserved consistently across the historical collection.
At a glance
A category-relative view of static frame geometry—not a fit grade or a promise of ride feel.
Reach and stack will appear here.
Head angle sets the marker; available trail and wheelbase appear as context.
Frame reference
Select an available measurement to locate it on the frame.
This changes only the frame treatment. No geometry value is inferred.
Encyclopedia: reach · stack · trail · wheelbase · bottom-bracket drop
—
—
Same bicycle
Published sizes from the same geometry table and configuration.
This compares frame coordinates. Adjacent labels are not a recommendation or universal size conversion.
Exact model history
Same brand, exact model identity, size and configuration only.
A year appears only when Velopedia has an exact model and size state with published reach, stack and head angle.
Choose the action that matches where you started.
Save one bicycle-only geometry profile. Rider-fit data and the changing closest-match list are not included.
Geometry finder
The closest match stays geometry-first. The remaining set favors brand variety; within tight geometry ties, a known original MSRP favors a similar price range.
—
Attached fit worksheet
—
Modern Archive benchmark
—
Archive analysis could not be loaded, so no comparison or closest-bike result is being shown.
Geometry guide
No single number defines a bicycle. Frame position, steering geometry and chassis length interact, and their meaning changes with category, wheel size and frame size. This analyzer reports those relationships separately so you can inspect each one.
Reach and stack describe the top of the head tube relative to the bottom bracket. Their relationship shows whether a frame is comparatively long and low, balanced, or tall for its length.
Head angle, wheel radius and fork offset combine to create ground trail. Head angle alone cannot fully describe steering response or self-centering.
Wheelbase is the total axle-to-axle span. Front center and rear center show where that length sits relative to the bottom bracket.
Bottom-bracket drop describes the crank axis relative to the axle line; bottom-bracket height describes it relative to the ground. Tire radius connects the two.
Reach is the horizontal distance from the bottom bracket to the top-center of the head tube; stack is the vertical distance. Stack-to-reach ratio is useful for comparing frame proportions without relying on inconsistent size names. It is not a fit prescription. Stem length, headset spacers, handlebar reach and rise, saddle position and rider proportions determine the actual contact points.
Ground trail is the horizontal ground distance between the steering-axis intercept and the tire contact point. A slacker head angle, larger wheel radius or shorter fork offset generally increases trail; the reverse generally reduces it. Trail helps describe steering geometry, but tire deformation, load, handlebar width, front-center length and speed also influence the response a rider feels.
Front center and rear center are direct bottom-bracket-to-axle dimensions. Bottom-bracket drop resolves those diagonal measurements horizontally. On a mixed-wheel bicycle the front and rear axle centers may sit at different heights, so the analyzer can use a separate published drop on each side. It can infer front center from wheelbase or calculate wheelbase from a supplied front center.
Bottom-bracket drop is a frame coordinate measured from an axle center. Bottom-bracket height is ground-relative, so wheel and tire radius matter. More drop can place the rider lower between equal-height wheels; less drop can preserve pedal clearance. When a mixed-wheel manufacturer publishes front/rear drop, keep both values: they describe the BB relative to two different axle heights. If drop is not published, leave it blank; the analyzer omits only the calculations that depend on it.
Archive method
The primary analyzer groups bicycle category, a bounded recent or selected model-year window and a normalized known-size band. It widens the year window only when the tighter cohort is too small.
Duplicate numeric geometry signatures are collapsed so repeated builds of the same chassis do not distort the comparison.
Results use phrases such as “near the middle” or “toward the longer end.” Exact percentile scores are deliberately withheld because the source data does not justify that appearance of precision.
Velopedia’s historical collection preserves head angle, wheelbase and rear-center measurements for thousands of bicycles from 1993–2007, but those source records do not identify frame size and do not contain modern reach or stack coordinates. The optional Historical reference view therefore compares only those three preserved chassis measurements. It does not treat a record as Medium, XL or a fit equivalent.
Closest matches are numerical neighbors across shared measurements, with reach, stack, head angle and wheelbase carrying the most influence. They are useful for discovering bicycles with related static proportions. They do not prove equivalent fit, suspension behavior, ride feel, intended use or component setup, and nominal size labels remain manufacturer-specific.