—
—
Velopedia Tools
Choose a bike and size. See what its geometry means.
Load a bike from the Archive or enter a geometry chart. Explore its proportions, steering and similar bikes.
Start with your bike
Choose a bike and size to load its published geometry.
Search by year, brand or model, then choose a size.
Enter reach, stack and head angle below. Add wheel details for trail and BB height.
Interactive example
Loading the interactive geometry example…
Horizontal bottom-bracket-to-head-tube coordinate.
This road/gravel example shows how the display works. Your analysis uses your chosen bike and size, then compares it with similar Archive bikes.
No particular bike in mind? Start with Bike Finder
Velopedia Archive analysis
Category-aware interpretation and comparison with preserved bicycle geometries.
Back to bike recordCalculating geometry and finding similar bikes.
Published source values
These measurements come from the historical record. They describe one unidentified source size, so Velopedia does not infer reach, stack, fit, or a frame drawing.
The period benchmark and closest records below use only head angle, wheelbase, and rear center—the three measurements preserved consistently across the historical collection.
At a glance
Based on this bike category. The Archive comparison below uses published bikes.
Reach and stack will appear here.
Head angle sets the marker; available trail and wheelbase appear as context.
Frame reference
Select an available measurement to locate it on the frame.
This changes only the frame treatment. No geometry value is inferred.
Encyclopedia: reach · stack · trail · wheelbase · bottom-bracket drop
—
—
Same bicycle
Published sizes from the same geometry table and configuration.
This compares frame coordinates. Adjacent labels are not a recommendation or universal size conversion.
Exact model history
Same brand, exact model identity, size and configuration only.
A year appears only when Velopedia has an exact model and size state with published reach, stack and head angle.
Choose the action that matches where you started.
Save one bicycle-only geometry profile. Rider-fit data and the changing closest-match list are not included.
Geometry finder
The closest match stays geometry-first. The remaining set favors brand variety; within tight geometry ties, a known original MSRP favors a similar price range.
—
Attached fit worksheet
—
Modern Archive benchmark
—
Archive analysis could not be loaded, so no comparison or closest-bike result is being shown.
Geometry guide
No single number tells you how a bike will fit or handle. Start with frame proportions, steering and wheelbase, then consider them together. Bike category, wheel size and frame size all matter.
Reach and stack describe the top of the head tube relative to the bottom bracket. Their relationship shows whether a frame is comparatively long and low, balanced, or tall for its length.
Head angle, wheel radius and fork offset combine to create ground trail. Head angle alone cannot fully describe steering response or self-centering.
Wheelbase is the total axle-to-axle span. Front center and rear center show where that length sits relative to the bottom bracket.
Bottom-bracket drop describes the crank axis relative to the axle line; bottom-bracket height describes it relative to the ground. Tire radius connects the two.
Reach is the horizontal distance from the bottom bracket to the top-center of the head tube; stack is the vertical distance. Stack-to-reach ratio is useful for comparing frame proportions without relying on inconsistent size names. It is not a fit prescription. Stem length, headset spacers, handlebar reach and rise, saddle position and rider proportions determine the actual contact points.
Ground trail is the horizontal ground distance between the steering-axis intercept and the tire contact point. A slacker head angle, larger wheel radius or shorter fork offset generally increases trail; the reverse generally reduces it. Trail helps describe steering geometry, but tire deformation, load, handlebar width, front-center length and speed also influence the response a rider feels.
Front center and rear center are direct bottom-bracket-to-axle dimensions. Bottom-bracket drop resolves those diagonal measurements horizontally. On a mixed-wheel bicycle the front and rear axle centers may sit at different heights, so the analyzer can use a separate published drop on each side. It can infer front center from wheelbase or calculate wheelbase from a supplied front center.
Bottom-bracket drop is a frame coordinate measured from an axle center. Bottom-bracket height is ground-relative, so wheel and tire radius matter. More drop can place the rider lower between equal-height wheels; less drop can preserve pedal clearance. When a mixed-wheel manufacturer publishes front/rear drop, keep both values: they describe the BB relative to two different axle heights. If drop is not published, leave it blank; the analyzer omits only the calculations that depend on it.
Archive method
The main comparison uses size-specific bikes in your selected category and a recent or selected year range. That range widens only when there are too few bikes to compare.
Identical geometry is counted once so multiple builds of the same frame do not skew the comparison.
Results use descriptions such as “near the middle” or “toward the longer end.” The available data does not support an exact percentile ranking.
Velopedia’s historical collection preserves head angle, wheelbase and rear-center measurements for thousands of bicycles from 1993–2007, but those source records do not identify frame size and do not contain modern reach or stack coordinates. The optional Historical reference view therefore compares only those three preserved chassis measurements. It does not treat a record as Medium, XL or a fit equivalent.
Closest matches are numerical neighbors across shared measurements, with reach, stack, head angle and wheelbase carrying the most influence. They are useful for discovering bicycles with related static proportions. They do not prove equivalent fit, suspension behavior, ride feel, intended use or component setup, and nominal size labels remain manufacturer-specific.