Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
1 of 2 bicycles
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Handling
2000 Jamis Dragon has a 0.5° slacker head-tube angle than 1999 Jamis Dragon in the archived geometry. Frame size is not identified for 2000 Jamis Dragon and 1999 Jamis Dragon.
Fork offset, tire size and wheelbase also affect steering; head angle alone is not a handling verdict.
- Gearing
2000 Jamis Dragon has a 8% lower climbing ratio than 1999 Jamis Dragon.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Lowest0.69:1Highest4.00:1Total range582%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gearHighest gear
Uses front tire 26×1.85; rear size isn’t listed.
Lowest0.75:1Highest4.18:1Total range558%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gearHighest gear
Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Specification
2000 Jamis Dragon
1999 Jamis Dragon
Overview
Model Year
2000
1999
Brand
Jamis
Jamis
Model
Dragon
Dragon
Bicycle Type
Mountain bike, front suspension
Mountain bike, front suspension
Original MSRP
$2,400.00
$2,399.95
Colors
Flame Red
Powder Coat Red
Sizes
11", 13", 15", 17", 19", 21"
11", 13", 15", 17", 19", 21"
Weight
23.5 lb
23.75 lb
Frameset
Frame Construction
Brazed/welded
Brazed/welded
Frame Material
Reynolds 853
Reynolds 853
Fork
Answer Manitou MARS CL, 3.15" travel
Answer Manitou SX Carbon, 2.75" travel
Fork Material
Carbon fiber/magnesium, triple-clamp crown
Carbon fiber composite/aluminum, triple-clamp crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
—
Shimano XTR
Shifters
SRAM 9.0 SL Half Pipe
Shimano XTR RapidFire SL
Front Derailleur
Shimano Deore XT top-swing, top-pull/clamp-on 28.6mm
Shimano XTR, top-pull/clamp-on 31.8mm
Rear Derailleur
SRAM 9.0 SL Short Cage
Shimano XTR GS
Crankset
Shimano Deore LX, 22/32/44 teeth
Shimano XTR M952, 24/34/46 teeth
Bottom Bracket
Shimano BB-ES70, 113mm spindle
Shimano BB-M952, 112.5mm spindle
BB Shell Width
68mm English
68mm English
Rear Cogs
9-speed, 11 - 32 teeth
9-speed, 11 - 32 teeth
Chain
Shimano CN-HG92, 1/2 x 3/32"
Shimano CN-7700, 1/2 x 3/32"
Pedals
Time ATAC
Time ATAC Carbon
Brakes
Brakes
Avid SD-Mag brakes, Avid SD-Mag levers
Shimano XTR V-Brake brakes, Shimano XTR levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1 1/8" threadless Cane Creek C2
1 1/8" threadless Cane Creek C2
Handlebar
Titec Enduro
Titec Enduro 141
Handlebar Extensions
Titec Shorty
Titec Shorty
Stem
Profile Stiffy
Titec Big AL
Saddle
SDG Ventura Comp, chromoly rails
SDG Comp Belair, titanium rails
Seatpost
Thomson Elite, 27.2mm diameter
Thomson Elite, 27.2mm diameter
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
Mavic Crossmax UST
Shimano XTR
Rims
Mavic Crossmax UST, 18-hole/20-hole
Sun Rims 0 XC, 28-hole/32-hole
Spokes
Mavic stainless steel, 2.0mm double-butted
Wheelsmith stainless steel, 1.8mm double-butted
Spoke Nipples
Alloy nipples
Alloy nipples
Front Tire
26 x 1.85" Hutchinson Python Tubeless
26 x 1.95" Tioga Factory XC kevlar
Wheel Size
26" wheels
26" wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
70.5°
71°
Seat-tube angle
73.5°
73.5°
Chainstay / rear center
424.2 mm
425 mm
Wheelbase
1054.1 mm
1055 mm
Fork offset / rake
38.1 mm
—
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.