Velopedia Bicycle Archive

Compare Bicycles

Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.

1 of 2 bicycles

At a glance

Key differences

Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.

  1. Identity & price

    These bicycles are categorized differently: 1997 Raleigh C30 is City & Commuter; 1999 Raleigh C30 is Hybrid.

  2. Gearing

    1997 Raleigh C30 has a 8% lower climbing ratio than 1999 Raleigh C30.

    A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.

Gearing comparison

Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.

RPM

RPM = pedal turns per minute.

1997 Raleigh C30Size Legacy reference · 42/34/22T · 14–28T · 7-speed
Lowest0.79:1Highest3.00:1Total range382%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.8 mphHighest gear22.1 mph

Uses front tire 700C×38; rear size isn’t listed.

1999 Raleigh C30Size Legacy reference · 42/34/24T · 11–28T · 7-speed
Lowest0.86:1Highest3.82:1Total range445%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear6.3 mphHighest gear28.1 mph

Uses front tire 700C×38; rear size isn’t listed.

How it works

Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.

Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.

Try other gearing

Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Print / PDFCSV
Specification
1997 Raleigh C30
1999 Raleigh C30
Overview
Model Year
1997
1999
Brand
Raleigh
Raleigh
Model
C30
C30
Bicycle Type
City/commuter
Hybrid
Original MSRP
$249.99
$269.99
Colors
Electric blackened purple, Moss Green/Black
Blackened Green, Cherrywood
Sizes
15", 17", 19", 21", 23", womens 16", womens 19"
15", 17", 19", 21", 23", womens 16", womens 19"
Weight
29.75 lb
30.5 lb
Frameset
Frame Construction
TIG-welded
TIG-welded
Frame Material
Chromoly seat tube/hi-tensile steel
Chromoly seat tube/hi-tensile steel
Fork
Raleigh
Raleigh
Fork Material
Hi-tensile steel, unicrown crown
Chromoly/hi-tensile steel, unicrown crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
Shimano AceraX
Hybrid Mix
Shifters
Grip Shift MRX-170
Shimano Revo TY-40
Front Derailleur
Shimano AceraX top-swing, bottom-pull/clamp-on 28.6 mm
Shimano AceraX top-swing, bottom-pull/clamp-on 28.6mm
Rear Derailleur
Shimano AceraX
Shimano AceraX
Crankset
Tracer MA-4i, 22/34/42 teeth
Shimano AceraX, 24/34/42 teeth
Bottom Bracket
Victor VPB-33, 116 mm spindle
Victor VPB-33, 117.5mm spindle
BB Shell Width
68mm English
68mm English
Rear Cogs
7-speed, 14 - 28 teeth
7-speed, 11 - 28 teeth
Chain
Shimano CN-UG50, 1/2 x 3/32"
KMC Z-51, 1/2 x 3/32"
Pedals
Resin
Wellgo LU-983
Brakes
Brakes
Shimano Altus brakes, aluminum levers
ProMax linear-pull brakes, ProMax alloy levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1" steel
1" Victor VP-H67
Handlebar
Steel
Steel
Handlebar Extensions
—
Not included
Stem
Steel
Steel
Saddle
Sella Stratos HyperPlush
Selle Stratos Hyper Expert Duo-Compound Lycra Comfort
Seatpost
Steel micro-adjust, 26.0 mm diameter
Aluminum micro-adjust, 26.0mm diameter
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
Aluminum quick release
Joy Tech OS aluminum, Q/R
Rims
Weinmann 519, 36-hole
Weinmann 519, 36-hole
Spokes
Steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Chung Nan stainless steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Spoke Nipples
Brass nipples
Brass nipples
Front Tire
700 x 38c multi-terrain
700 x 38c Kenda K-830
Wheel Size
700c wheels
700c wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
71°
71°
Seat-tube angle
73°
73°
Chainstay / rear center
431.8 mm
431.8 mm
Wheelbase
1041.4 mm
1038.9 mm
Fork offset / rake
40.6 mm
40.6 mm

Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.

Campaign
Scroll to Top