- Frame
- Tange #2
- Groupset
- Shimano Exage ES
Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
- Frame
- Tange chromoly, double-butted
- Brakes
- Shimano AceraX brakes, Shimano RX-100 levers
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Handling
1995 Nashbar 6000T has a 2.0° slacker head-tube angle than 1993 Nashbar 6000T in the archived geometry. Frame size is not identified for 1993 Nashbar 6000T and 1995 Nashbar 6000T.
Fork offset, tire size and wheelbase also affect steering; head angle alone is not a handling verdict.
- Gearing
1993 Nashbar 6000T has a 7% lower climbing ratio than 1995 Nashbar 6000T.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Rear tire: 26×2.
Uses front tire 700C×38; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.