Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
- Frame
- 6061-T6 aluminum
- Groupset
- Mountain Mix
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Data limitation
No geometry is recorded for 2012 Diamondback Response and 2010 Diamondback Response.
- Gearing
2010 Diamondback Response has a 12% lower climbing ratio than 2012 Diamondback Response.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
- Equipment
2010 Diamondback Response has 20 mm more front travel than 2012 Diamondback Response in the selected sizes.
Front travel is fork suspension stroke, not rear-wheel travel.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Speed unavailable: wheel or tire size is missing or unclear.
Uses front tire 26×2.1; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run.