- Frame
- Chromoly seat tube/hi-tensile steel
- Groupset
- Shimano AceraX
Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
- Frame
- Chromoly seat tube/hi-tensile steel
- Groupset
- Shimano Altus C90
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Identity & price
These bicycles are categorized differently: 1997 Raleigh C30 is City & Commuter; 1996 Raleigh C30 is Hybrid.
- Handling
1996 Raleigh C30 has a 1.0° slacker head-tube angle than 1997 Raleigh C30 in the archived geometry. Frame size is not identified for 1997 Raleigh C30 and 1996 Raleigh C30.
Fork offset, tire size and wheelbase also affect steering; head angle alone is not a handling verdict.
- Gearing
1997 Raleigh C30 has a 8% lower climbing ratio than 1996 Raleigh C30.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Uses front tire 700C×38; rear size isn’t listed.
Uses front tire 700C×38; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.