Velopedia Bicycle Archive

Compare Bicycles

Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.

1 of 2 bicycles

At a glance

Key differences

Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.

  1. Gearing

    1999 Rocky Mountain Cardiac has a 7% lower climbing ratio than 1996 Rocky Mountain Cardiac.

    A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.

Gearing comparison

Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.

RPM

RPM = pedal turns per minute.

1996 Rocky Mountain CardiacSize Legacy reference · 42/32/22T · 11–28T · 7-speed
Lowest0.79:1Highest3.82:1Total range486%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.5 mphHighest gear26.8 mph

Uses front tire 26×2.1; rear size isn’t listed.

1999 Rocky Mountain CardiacSize Legacy reference · 42/32/22T · 11–30T · 8-speed
Lowest0.73:1Highest3.82:1Total range521%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.1 mphHighest gear26.5 mph

Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.

How it works

Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.

Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.

Try other gearing

Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Print / PDFCSV
Specification
1996 Rocky Mountain Cardiac
1999 Rocky Mountain Cardiac
Overview
Model Year
1996
1999
Brand
Rocky Mountain
Rocky Mountain
Model
Cardiac
Cardiac
Bicycle Type
Mountain bike, non-suspension
Mountain bike, front suspension
Original MSRP
$499.00
$589.00
Colors
Black
Lazer Black
Sizes
14.5", 16", 17.5", 18.5", 19.5", 21"
14.5", 16", 17.5", 18.5", 19.5", 21"
Weight
26.4 lb
26.4 lb
Frameset
Frame Construction
TIG-welded steel
TIG-welded
Frame Material
Tange chromoly, double-butted
Chromoly, butted
Fork
Tange
Rock Shox Jett T2, 2.5" travel
Fork Material
Tange chromoly, unicrown crown
Aluminum/magnesium, triple-clamp crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
Shimano STX/Alivio
Mountain Mix
Shifters
Grip Shift SRT-400
Shimano Alivio RapidFire SL
Front Derailleur
Shimano Alivio top-swing, top-pull/clamp-on 28.6 mm
Shimano Alivio, clamp-on 28.6mm
Rear Derailleur
Shimano STX
Shimano Alivio
Crankset
RMB CPI Model I, 22/32/42 teeth
Cyclone, 22/32/42 teeth
Bottom Bracket
Shimano BB-LP26, 110 mm spindle
Shimano cartridge, 110mm spindle
BB Shell Width
68mm English
73mm English
Rear Cogs
7-speed, 11 - 28 teeth
8-speed, 11 - 30 teeth
Chain
Sachs SC40, 1/2 x 3/32"
Sachs PC-41, 1/2 x 3/32"
Pedals
Fasten NWL-90K w/clips & straps
Aluminum w/clips & straps
Brakes
Brakes
Shimano STX M-System brakes, Tektro 360AP levers
Linear-pull brakes, linear-pull levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1 1/8" threadless Dia-Compe Kontak Aheadset ST-2
1 1/8" Ritchey Logic
Handlebar
RMB Stratos 1
Aluminum, butted
Handlebar Extensions
Not included
Not included
Stem
RMB chromoly
Forged alloy
Saddle
Selle Italia Triax Racing
Selle Italia Nitrox PD
Seatpost
RMB Stratos 1, 26.8 mm diameter
Aluminum micro-adjust, 26.8mm diameter
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
—
Front: Shimano AceraX, Rear: Shimano Alivio
Rims
Sun Metal L18, 32-hole
Sun Rims CR18, 32-hole
Spokes
Chung Nan stainless steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
DT Champion stainless steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Spoke Nipples
Brass nipples
Brass nipples
Front Tire
26 x 2.10" Ritchey Mega-Bite Z-Max
26 x 1.95" Michelin X Sport
Wheel Size
26" wheels
26" wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
70.5°
70.5°
Seat-tube angle
73°
73°
Chainstay / rear center
430 mm
430 mm
Wheelbase
—
1050 mm
Fork offset / rake
41 mm
—

Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.

Campaign
Scroll to Top