Velopedia Bicycle Archive

Compare Bicycles

Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.

1 of 2 bicycles

At a glance

Key differences

Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.

  1. Handling

    1996 Fuji Nevada has a 1.0° slacker head-tube angle than 2000 Fuji Nevada in the archived geometry. Frame size is not identified for 1996 Fuji Nevada and 2000 Fuji Nevada.

    Fork offset, tire size and wheelbase also affect steering; head angle alone is not a handling verdict.

  2. Gearing

    2000 Fuji Nevada has a 7% lower climbing ratio than 1996 Fuji Nevada.

    A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.

Gearing comparison

Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.

RPM

RPM = pedal turns per minute.

1996 Fuji NevadaSize Legacy reference · 42/34/24T · 11–28T · 7-speed
Lowest0.86:1Highest3.82:1Total range445%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear6.0 mphHighest gear26.6 mph

Uses front tire 26×2; rear size isn’t listed.

2000 Fuji NevadaSize Legacy reference · 42/34/24T · 11–30T · 8-speed
Lowest0.80:1Highest3.82:1Total range477%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear5.6 mphHighest gear26.8 mph

Rear tire: 26×2.1.

How it works

Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.

Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.

Try other gearing

Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Print / PDFCSV
Specification
1996 Fuji Nevada
2000 Fuji Nevada
Overview
Model Year
1996
2000
Brand
Fuji
Fuji
Model
Nevada
Nevada
Bicycle Type
Mountain bike, non-suspension
Mountain bike, front suspension
Original MSRP
$299.99
$299.99
Colors
Blue/red, Green, Pink
Black/Silver Two Tone, Blue/Red Two Tone
Sizes
15", 17", 19", 20.5", 22", 24"
15", 17", 19", 20.5", 22", 24"
Weight
28.5 lb
—
Frameset
Frame Construction
TIG-welded steel
TIG-welded
Frame Material
Chromoly main triangle/hi-tensile steel rear stays
7005 aluminum
Fork
Fuji
RST 281-R
Fork Material
Hi-tensile steel, unicrown crown
Aluminum, triple-clamp crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
Shimano AceraX
Mountain Mix
Shifters
Grip Shift MRX-100
Shimano Acera EZ Fire Plus
Front Derailleur
Suntour FD-XT150, bottom-pull/clamp-on 28.6 mm
Shimano Altus C90 top-swing, clamp-on 31.8mm
Rear Derailleur
Shimano AceraX
Shimano Acera
Crankset
Cyclone CPI-3485 SQS, 24/34/42 teeth
SR XR180, 24/34/42 teeth
Bottom Bracket
Tien Hsin BB-7600, 113 mm spindle
VP, 113mm spindle
BB Shell Width
68mm English
—
Rear Cogs
7-speed, 11 - 28 teeth
8-speed, 11 - 30 teeth
Chain
Shimano CN-HG50, 1/2 x 3/32"
Shimano CN-IG31, 1/2 x 3/32"
Pedals
Wellgo LU-895
Vp
Brakes
Brakes
Jo-Ying 990A brakes, Jo-Ying 292A levers
ProMax linear-pull brakes, Shimano levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1" Chin Haur CH90
1 1/8" threadless Cane Creek
Handlebar
Fuji steel
Fuji alloy
Handlebar Extensions
Not included
Not included
Stem
Fuji steel
Alloy
Saddle
Fuji Duraflex
Fuji DuraFlex Racing
Seatpost
Fuji steel, 26.6 mm diameter
Alloy
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
—
Front: alloy, Rear: Shimano
Rims
Alex VP-20, 36-hole
Weinmann CN-520, 36-hole
Spokes
Steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Stainless steel, 2.0mm
Spoke Nipples
Brass nipples
—
Front Tire
26 x 2.00" Duro HF-822
26 x 2.10" Kenda Hammer
Rear Tire
—
26 x 2.10" Kenda Anvil
Wheel Size
26" wheels
26" wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
70°
71°
Seat-tube angle
73.5°
73°
Chainstay / rear center
429.3 mm
419.1 mm
Wheelbase
1054.1 mm
—
Fork offset / rake
55.1 mm
—

Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.

Campaign
Scroll to Top