Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Identity & price
These bicycles are categorized differently: 2000 Rocky Mountain Metro is Touring; 1993 Rocky Mountain Metro is Hybrid.
- Handling
2000 Rocky Mountain Metro has a 0.5° slacker head-tube angle than 1993 Rocky Mountain Metro in the archived geometry. Frame size is not identified for 2000 Rocky Mountain Metro and 1993 Rocky Mountain Metro.
Fork offset, tire size and wheelbase also affect steering; head angle alone is not a handling verdict.
- Gearing
2000 Rocky Mountain Metro has a 30% lower climbing ratio than 1993 Rocky Mountain Metro.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
- Identity & price
2000 Rocky Mountain Metro had an original MSRP $151 lower than 1993 Rocky Mountain Metro.
Original MSRP is the published list price when new, not today’s used-bike value.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Uses front tire 700C×40; rear size isn’t listed.
Speed unavailable: wheel or tire size is missing or unclear.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.