- Frame
- Chromoly / hi-tensile steel
- Groupset
- Shimano AceraX
Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
1 of 2 bicycles
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Gearing
1995 Research Dynamics Coyote Two has a 14% lower climbing ratio than 1997 Research Dynamics Coyote Two.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
- Identity & price
1997 Research Dynamics Coyote Two had an original MSRP $166 lower than 1995 Research Dynamics Coyote Two.
Original MSRP is the published list price when new, not today’s used-bike value.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Lowest0.86:1Highest3.45:1Total range403%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gearHighest gear
Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.
Lowest1.00:1Highest3.43:1Total range343%
Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gearHighest gear
Uses front tire 26×2.1; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.
Specification
1995 Research Dynamics Coyote Two
1997 Research Dynamics Coyote Two
Overview
Model Year
1995
1997
Brand
Research Dynamics
Research Dynamics
Model
Coyote Two
Coyote Two
Bicycle Type
Mountain bike, front suspension
Mountain bike, non-suspension
Original MSRP
$425.00
$259.00
Colors
Silver
Red/black fade, Silver
Sizes
12.5", 15.5", 17.5", 18.5", 19.5"
12.5", 15.5", 17.5", 18.5", 19.5"
Weight
30.1 lb
29.6 lb
Frameset
Frame Construction
TIG-welded steel
TIG-welded
Frame Material
Chromoly / hi-tensile steel
Hi-tensile steel
Fork
SR DuoTrack 7005
Research Dynamics
Fork Material
Aluminum, chromoly, triple-clamp crown
Hi-tensile steel, unicrown crown
Drivetrain
Component Group
Shimano AceraX
Shimano Tourney TY-22
Shifters
Grip Shift SRT-300
Grip Shift MRX-100
Front Derailleur
Shimano Altus C90, bottom-pull/bottom bracket mount
Shimano Tourney TY-30, bottom-pull/clamp-on 28.6 mm
Rear Derailleur
Shimano AceraX
Shimano Altus
Crankset
Shimano Altus C90, 24/32/38 teeth
Prowheel S-355, 28/38/48 teeth
Bottom Bracket
—
YST BB 612, 122.5 mm spindle
BB Shell Width
—
68mm English
Rear Cogs
7-speed, 11 - 28 teeth
7-speed, 14 - 28 teeth
Chain
KMC Alpha 50, 1/2 x 3/32"
KMC UG-50, 1/2 x 3/32"
Pedals
Wellgo LU-895
Fasten NW-99B
Brakes
Brakes
Shimano Altus C90 brakes, Dia-Compe PC-3 levers
Guan Chih N888P brakes, Guan Chih N394BP levers
Cockpit & Contact Points
Headset
1" Chin Haur CH90
1" YST 663EB
Handlebar
Leadtech DHM-ST-15.6
Hsin Lung MTB 110
Handlebar Extensions
Not included
Not included
Stem
Lee Chi
Jye Chen JC80U
Saddle
Velo VL-235
Velo VL-218
Seatpost
Kalloy SP-242, 26.2 mm diameter
Kalloy SP-200, 25.4 mm diameter
Wheels & Tires
Hubs
Joy Tech alloy sealed hubset, Q/R
Front: Jou Yu JY-414 Q/R, Rear: Joy Tech JY-434
Rims
Araya VP-20, 36-hole
HJC P-GN aluminum, 36-hole
Spokes
Stainless steel, 2.0 mm straight gauge
Stainless steel, 2.0mm straight gauge
Spoke Nipples
Brass nipples
Brass nipples
Front Tire
26 x 1.95" Kenda K-831
26 x 2.10" Super East 117
Wheel Size
26" wheels
26" wheels
Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle
Geometry size
Head-tube angle
70°
70°
Seat-tube angle
73°
73°
Chainstay / rear center
436.9 mm
436.9 mm
Wheelbase
1066.8 mm
1092.2 mm
Fork offset / rake
43 mm
45.7 mm
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.