Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Identity & price
These bicycles are categorized differently: 2004 GT Chucker 2.0 is Mountain; 2006 GT Chucker 2.0 is BMX.
- Data limitation
No geometry is recorded for 2004 GT Chucker 2.0 and 2006 GT Chucker 2.0.
- Gearing
2006 GT Chucker 2.0 has a 38% lower climbing ratio than 2004 GT Chucker 2.0.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
- Equipment
2006 GT Chucker 2.0 has 25 mm more front travel than 2004 GT Chucker 2.0 in the selected sizes.
Front travel is fork suspension stroke, not rear-wheel travel.
- Identity & price
2004 GT Chucker 2.0 had an original MSRP $100 lower than 2006 GT Chucker 2.0.
Original MSRP is the published list price when new, not today’s used-bike value.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Uses front tire 26×2.4; rear size isn’t listed.
Uses front tire 26×2.35; rear size isn’t listed.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run.