Velopedia Bicycle Archive

Compare Bicycles

Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.

Mountain · Non-electric

2003 Jamis Cross Country 1.0

Selected size
Original MSRP: $269.95

View record

Mountain · Non-electric

2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.0

Selected size: Not published
Original MSRP: $309.95

View record

1 of 2 bicycles

At a glance

Key differences

Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.

Data limitation
No geometry is recorded for 2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.0.
Gearing
2003 Jamis Cross Country 1.0 has a 6% lower climbing ratio than 2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.0.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
Equipment
2003 Jamis Cross Country 1.0 has 7 mm more front travel than 2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.0 in the selected sizes.
Front travel is fork suspension stroke, not rear-wheel travel.

Gearing comparison

Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.

Pedal cadence

RPM

Speed units

RPM = pedal turns per minute.

2003 Jamis Cross Country 1.0Size Legacy reference · 42/32/22T · 13–34T · 7-speed

Lowest0.65:1Highest3.23:1Total range499%

Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear4.5 mphHighest gear22.4 mph

Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.

2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.042/32/22T · 11–32T · 8-speed

Lowest0.69:1Highest3.82:1Total range555%

Estimated speed at 90 RPMLowest gear4.8 mphHighest gear26.5 mph

Uses front tire 26×1.95; rear size isn’t listed.

How it works

Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.

Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.

Try other gearing

Complete specification tableShows different published values and gaps where a bicycle lacks data. Different wording reflects source language, not necessarily different components. Swipe for more columns.

Specification

2003 Jamis Cross Country 1.0

2005 Jamis Cross Country 1.0

Overview

Model Year

2003

2005

Brand

Jamis

Model

Cross Country 1.0

Bicycle Type

Mountain bike, front suspension

Original MSRP

$269.95

$309.95

Colors

Gloss White/Midnight Blue, Platinum/Gloss Black

Red, Silver

Sizes

12", 14", 17", 19", 21", womens 14.5", womens 17.5"

12", 14", 17", 19", 21"

Weight

29.5 lb

31.25 lb

Frameset

Frame Construction

TIG-welded

Frame Material

6061 T6 aluminum

Fork

In-Sync Grind 323, 70mm travel

SR Suntour XC50, 63mm travel

Fork Material

Aluminum/magnesium, single crown

Drivetrain

Component Group

Mountain Mix

Shifters

Shimano Acera EF35

Front Derailleur

SRAM 3.0, top-pull/clamp-on 31.8mm

Rear Derailleur

Shimano Acera

Shimano Altus

Crankset

Cyclone aluminum, 22/32/42 teeth

SR Suntour XCC-150PB, 22/32/42 teeth

Bottom Bracket

Loose ball, 122.5mm spindle

BB Shell Width

68mm English

Rear Cogs

7-speed, 13 - 34 teeth

8-speed, 11 - 32 teeth

Chain

KMC UG-50, 1/2 x 3/32"

KMC IG-31, 1/2 x 3/32"

Pedals

Wellgo resin

Brakes

Tektro forged linear-pull brakes, Shimano Acera levers

Cockpit & Contact Points

Headset

1 1/8" threadless Tange TG-4

Handlebar

Aluminum, 1" rise

Handlebar Extensions

Not included

Stem

Jamis aluminum

Saddle

Jamis ATB

Seatpost

Aluminum, suspension, 27.2mm diameter

Aluminum micro-adjust, 27.2mm diameter

Wheels & Tires

Hubs

Formula aluminum, Q/R

Rims

Weinmann CN-520, 32-hole

Spokes

Stainless steel, 14ga. (2.0mm) straight gauge

Spoke Nipples

Brass nipples

Front Tire

26 x 1.95" Cheng Shin

Wheel Size

26" wheels

Geometry · choose a size for each bicycle

Geometry size

—

Head-tube angle

71°

—

Seat-tube angle

73.5°

—

Chainstay / rear center

425 mm

—

Wheelbase

1059 mm

—

Fork offset / rake

38.1 mm

—

Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run. Legacy reference geometry is model-level historical data whose corresponding frame size is not identified; compare those dimensions as reference values rather than size-normalized fit data.

Campaign