Velopedia Bicycle Archive
Compare Bicycles
Compare published geometry, gearing and specifications for up to three bicycles.
Edit comparison
Add a bicycle
Search the Archive without leaving this comparison.
At a glance
Key differences
Supported differences are shown below. Data limitations are labeled separately.
- Data limitation
No geometry is recorded for 2010 Cannondale Scalpel 3 and 2012 Cannondale Scalpel 3.
- Gearing
2010 Cannondale Scalpel 3 has a 10% lower climbing ratio than 2012 Cannondale Scalpel 3.
A lower ratio gives more mechanical advantage; rear-wheel rollout determines distance per crank turn.
- Equipment
2010 Cannondale Scalpel 3 has 10 mm more front travel than 2012 Cannondale Scalpel 3 in the selected sizes.
Front travel is fork suspension stroke, not rear-wheel travel.
Gearing comparison
Lower gears help on climbs. Higher gears suit higher speeds.
RPM = pedal turns per minute.
Uses front tire 26×2.1; rear size isn’t listed.
Speed unavailable: wheel or tire size is missing or unclear.
How it works
Ratio = front teeth ÷ rear teeth. Hub gears also include the hub’s internal ratio. A 400% range means the highest ratio is four times the lowest.
Speeds are estimates from tire size and pedal cadence. Actual speeds vary.
Historical specifications are presented as an archival reference. Components may have varied by market, size, or production run.